Review: Epson EcoTank Photo ET-8500/ET-8550

ET-8550, shown with ink bottles.

I was intrigued when Epson announced the EcoTank Photo ET-8500 and ET-8550 in mid-2021. These were the latest iteration of their “supertank,” high-capacity inkjet printers, but aimed at photographers and graphic artists. These were the first EcoTank printers to offer a six-color print engine tuned for printing photos, while also offering high-quality document printing and scan/copy support. Reading through Epson’s lofty marketing language, which talked about “lab-quality color photos and graphics at an incredible value,” it was clear that, if the company followed through on its promise, the ET-8500/ET-8550 could very well usher in a new era of high-quality photo prints, at significantly lower costs than classic, cartridge-based, photo printers.

After working in-depth with the letter-size model, the ET-8500, for the past few months, I will say that these printers truly are the most exciting photo printers I have come across in a long time. They have excellent photo quality, flexible paper handling options and superb usability, with print costs that are a fraction of those found in specialized photo printers. The EcoTank Photo printers are not for everyone—you wouldn’t use one of these for gallery-ready prints, for example—but they are perfect if you want to get into printing your photos, and want great output with minimal hassle.


ET-8500/ET-8550 Review

  1. What is a supertank printer, anyway?
  2. Specifications
  3. Basics and setup
  4. EcoTank inks
  5. Paper handling
  6. Print quality
  7. Ink usage
  8. Other items of note
  9. Conclusions

What is a supertank printer, anyway?

The supertank class of high-capacity inkjets is designed to go head-to-head with laser printers, with low-cost black-and-white or color output, high-speed print engines, and good overall print quality. With large, refillable ink reservoirs, supertank printers dispense with the small-capacity—and ecologically wasteful—plastic cartridges found in most consumer inkjets, while dropping the costs of document printing to a price point comparable with lasers. Epson’s first supertank printers shipped more than a decade ago, and since then Canon and HP have also entered the supertank space, with their MegaTank and Smart Tank printer lines, respectively.

While most four-color supertank printers that I looked at in the past were capable of printing photos, I rarely saw prints that were anywhere near the quality level that we have come to expect from specialized photo printers,1To be fair, most dedicated photo printers generally have six to 12 ink colors, which provides a wider gamut than is possible with the standard cyan, magenta, yellow, black (CMYK) inksets. which is one reason why the EcoTank Photo line is so intriguing.2Canon has also announced a six-color supertank all-in-one printer, the $300 Pixma G620. I have ordered one for review, but supplies have been constrained for months. As soon as I get it in, I’ll post my findings. (UPDATE, June 2022: Don’t waste your time — this is not a printer for a serious amateur.)


EcoTank Photo specifications

The ET-8500 and the ET-8550 are essentially two versions of the same printer. They share the same inkset, ink capacity, print engine, connectivity options, interface and paper handling. The ET-8500 has a maximum paper width of 11 inches (and a smaller footprint), while the ET-8550 can print up to 13 inches wide. Full specs for each printer are listed in the table below.

EcoTank Photo ET-8500 EcoTank Photo ET-8550
Type  Hybrid Dye/Pigment-based all-in-one inkjet (print, scan, copy)
Price  $600 $700
Ink set  6 Claria ET Premium inks (5 printing)
Ink colors  Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Photo Black, Gray (all dyes); Black (pigment)
Ink replacement costs  Dye inks are $17.49 (70ml); pigmented Black (70ml) is $19.99
Ink cost per ml  $0.25 (dye inks); $0.28 (pigmented Black) 
Maximum resolution  5760 by 1440 dpi 
Minimum paper size  2.2" x 3.4" 
Maximum sheet size 8.5" x 11" 13" x 19"
Maximum printable area  8.5" x 78.7" 13" x 78.7"
Roll paper support  No
Straight path  Yes; media up to 1.5mm thick 
Interfaces  USB 3.0; 100Base-T Ethernet; 2.4 GHz (802.11n) and 5 GHz Wireless (IEEE802.11 b/g/n/ac) 
Operating systems supported  macOS 10.6.8 or later; Windows 7 and later; iOS and Android
Weight  18.5 pounds 24.5 pounds
Dimensions when printing (W, D, H)  15.9" x 24.1" x 13.7"  20.6" x 29.8" x 16.9"
Dimensions when closed (W, D, H)  15.9" x 14.5" x 6.4" 20.6" x 14.9" x 10.3"
Additional features Built-in flatbed scanner (1200 by 4800 dpi) with copier options; duplexing for plain paper printing; SD card and USB memory stick ports on front; CD/DVD disc printing.

For this review, I tested the EcoTank Photo ET-8500, but most of my comments regarding print speed, paper handling, usability, and print quality will also be applicable to the ET-8550. I will note any differences in the text.

Basics and setup

As has been the case with other recent Epson inkjets, setting up the ET-8500 is relatively simple, and Epson provides clear documentation to get you up and running with minimal trouble. The printer can be connected via USB, Ethernet or WiFi, and can be set up from either a Mac or Windows computer or an iOS/Android device.

Epson includes six 70ml ink bottles with the printer. While it initially seems a bit freaky to be holding an open bottle of ink and inserting it into the appropriate tank opening, it really is a clean operation. The bottles are keyed to their specific color and have some sort of valve in the stem to prevent spills, and the tanks are labelled clearly. And, when you insert an ink bottle into the printer, it will automatically stop filling when the ink reaches the top line of the tank. With care, you shouldn’t get ink anywhere other than its tank (Epson’s primary caution is that you don’t squeeze the bottles during the filling process). When I filled my printer’s tanks for the first time, there was a small amount of ink left in each bottle, and I ended up topping off the tanks with the remainder after approximately 400 prints.

Unlike the ink cartridges found in most classic inkjets, the EcoTank printers’ ink levels are visible from the front of the printer. Each tank is marked in 25-percent increments, which makes it easy to get a sense of your ink usage, and when you might need to add more ink. If you’ve ever been frustrated at trying to figure out how much ink there really is in that ink cartridge, you’ll love the EcoTank setup.

The EcoTank Photo printers have easy-to-read ink level indicators, letting you know exactly how much ink you have left in each tank. This photo was taken after we had printed 500 photos.

As they did with the SureColor P700 and P900 printers, Epson put a large, 4.3-inch touchscreen display on the front of the ET-8500, and it’s a joy to use. The display can be tilted up for a better viewing angle, and is quite bright. Some controls (like setting paper thickness) can only be accessed through the touchscreen, but the menu system is clean and uncluttered.

EcoTank Photo Inks

The Claria ET Premium inks used in the ET-8500 and the ET-8550 are a hybrid dye/pigment inkset, of which only five inks print at any one time. There are five dye inks—Photo Black, Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Gray—and a single pigmented Black ink. The print driver determines which black ink will get used, based on the paper type. The pigmented Black is used when plain paper, matte-finish/art papers or card stock is selected; Photo Black is used when printing on any photo paper type.

Paper handling

The ET-8500 has four options for loading paper:

  • A full-size front tray that can hold up to 100 sheets of plain paper (or approximately 10-20 sheets of photo paper), and supports automatic duplexing of plain paper documents.
  • A smaller front tray for up to 20 sheets of 4×6 or 5×7 photo paper.
  • A rear-feed slot that can hold up to 50 sheets of plain paper or 5 sheets of standard-thickness photo paper.
  • An additional rear-feed mechanism with a straight printing path for handling media up to 1.3mm thick.

Overall, the paper handling options are quite good. I love being able to have one tray with 5×7 semigloss paper while loading the main tray with plain paper, and the top rear-feed slot works very well for printing on beefier papers. Epson made a point when announcing the EcoTank Photo printers that they would support many of the company’s Signature Worthy line of papers, including Premium Luster and Velvet Fine Art, and the top rear slot is perfect for both those papers.

When testing the printer, I successfully printed on most of Epson’s recommended photo papers, including Premium Glossy, Premium Luster, Semigloss Photo Paper, Premium Matte and Velvet Fine Art. I also profiled a number of Epson higher-end papers, including Exhibition Fiber and Legacy Fibre, as well as quite a few third-party papers from Red River, Canson, and others. Most papers printed fine from the top rear-feed slot, although some of the heavier papers had faint roller indentations on them, which necessitated my using the straight path feed (and which printed those papers without any indentations).

Setting up the rear-feed mechanism with the straight paper path was initially quite confusing. You have to pull the paper feed unit from the back of the printer, and then remove a small plastic guide and snap that piece inside the printer. It sounds simple, but the first time I tried to set up the straight path, I couldn’t tell at all what I was supposed to do. There was a set of very small graphics indicating what you need to do to set up the straight path, but my poor eyesight really couldn’t discern what I was supposed to do, now that I had the paper feed unit removed. The online manual and the help screens on the touchscreen display weren’t much help either, but I noticed a small QR code to the left of the row of graphics, which led me to a languid YouTube video3I’m not joking; check it out. from Epson Japan, where I was able to tell how exactly to set the mechanism so that it would accept paper, which turns out to be quite simple.

When you’re using the straight path, you can only use that option for printing; with the paper feed unit removed, any attempts to print from another source will toss the paper out the back of the printer. Also, the straight path only supports paper sizes of 8×10 and up.

For the most part, I found the paper handling of the ET-8500 to be excellent. If I had one complaint, it would be that you can’t set the option for thick papers from the print driver, only from the touchscreen, and when you change that setting, it is reset once you power down the printer.

When you consider that the ET-8500 is essentially a five-ink photo printer (one of the blacks plus CMY/Gray), the prints that come from this printer are pretty amazing. I think that most of this comes from Epson’s deep, decades-long expertise with screening algorithms and ink technology; in the case of the ET-8500/ET-8550, Epson’s engineers have been able—quite remarkably—to maximize quality while using a seemingly limited inkset.

The key appears to be due to the inclusion of Gray in the inkset in the EcoTank Photo models. Much like older Epson Pro printers4Like the Stylus Photo 2880 and the Stylus Pro 3800, both of which were reviewed here, long ago in a printerverse far, far away. [You can find them all in our reviews gulag.], which used “Light” inks to help with subtle gradations of tones throughout the color spectrum, the Gray ink in the EcoTank Photo printers seems to handle most of this work with regards to improving print quality. Gray helps with full color images, as well as with grayscale photo prints (more on this below), and when printing on plain paper.5This also means that the Gray ink is apparently used much more than the other inks. More on that below.

One of the strengths of dye-based photo printers is their quality on glossy and semigloss paper types, and the ET-8500 more than held its own with dedicated dye-based photo printers like Epson’s six-ink Expression XP-15000 and Canon’s eight-ink Pixma Pro-200. Prints on glossy paper looked great, with that continuous tone look that only glossy papers can provide, displaying bright, vibrant colors and true-to-life skin tones. On my calibrated system, prints looked as they appeared on-screen, even when using Epson’s built-in paper profiles.

While the ET-8500 excels when printing on glossy and luster papers, my results with matte or fine art papers were quite good as well. Epson’s Velvet Fine Art, for example, produced lovely prints with fine detail, as did Epson’s Premium Matte paper. I also got great prints with Red River’s Aurora Art White and Palo Duro Smooth Rag art papers.

Other than for Velvet Fine Art and Premium Luster, Epson doesn’t include profiles for other papers in their Signature Worthy line of media. I did profile their Exhibition Fiber paper, a soft gloss fiber-based paper that I use quite frequently, as well as their Legacy Fibre, an ultra-high-end cotton fiber paper with a matte finish. Despite these papers being designed for pigment prints, I was delighted with the few prints I made on them. Given the price per sheet of these papers, it’s not something most people will go to, but I do think that there are many third-party paper manufacturers with excellent paper types—matte or photo—that will work with the EcoTank Photo printers.6Currently, only Red River had posted color profiles for the ET-8500/ET-8550.

Regarding black-and-white prints: in the print driver, Epson has a dedicated Black and White photo mode that lets you print with Neutral, Warm, Cool, and Sepia toning. For the most part, the Neutral option does a very good job of producing neutral prints. When comparing ET-8500 black-and-white prints with those from Canon’s Pro-200, some reviewers felt that there were some images where Canon produced a more truly neutral print, noting that the ET-8500’s print had a very slight cool tint to it, but it depended upon the photo, the lighting, and the media used7In general, when producing black-and-white prints, dye inks tend to display much more variability under different lighting conditions than pigments. It’s one reason why most fine-art black-and-white work is printed on pigment printers..

How good are the prints, really?

How close is the print quality of the ET-8500 to pricier dye-based inkjets, like the Canon Pro-200 or pigment printers like Epson’s own SureColor P700 or Canon’s imagePROGRAF Pro-300? To my eye, the wider gamut of the eight- to 10-ink printers is an advantage, but it’s slight, and I honestly don’t think most amateur photographers would notice the difference in prints from one printer to another.

When I displayed glossy and luster comparison prints made on the ET-8500, the XP-15000, and the Pro-200, most viewers said that there wasn’t a bad print in the group, and no one could reliably pick out one model’s prints as better than others. When comparing the ET-8500 output with glossy and luster pigment prints from the P900 and the Pro-300, many viewers sensed a difference, but generally picked the ET-8500 as their favorite; there was just something about the vibrancy of the photos from the ET-8500, especially on glossy media.

Pigment printers do have a slight advantage with fine art and matte media types, and viewers were a bit more discerning, picking the pigment printers as generally better than those on the ET-8500. There, the wider gamut of printers like the P900 and the Pro-300 will produce more nuanced prints on uncoated media. But, as is the case with the glossy output, unless you’re a fine-art photographer, you’re not going to feel that the ET-8500 is holding you back, at least with respect to the quality of the prints.

Ink use

In addition to quality, the other primary reason to consider the EcoTank Photo twins is the ludicrously low ink costs, and the expansive tank capacities for the six inks. At 70ml per bottle of ink, and with a cost per ml of 25 cents (28 cents for the pigmented Black ink), these printers are built to keep you from constantly buying replacement inks. Just compare the costs of the ET-8500/ET-8850 inks to that of its peers in the dedicated photo printer market:

  • Epson Photo ET-8500/ET-8550: 70ml ink bottles, priced at $0.25 per ml (dyes); $0.28 per ml (Black)
  • Epson SureColor P700: 25ml cartridges, $1.52 per ml
  • Epson SureColor P900: 50ml cartridges, $0.84 per ml
  • Canon imagePROGRAF Pro-300: 14.4 ml cartridges, $0.90 per ml8One of my long-standing complaints about the Canon desktop inkjets has been their low-capacity ink cartridges. Not only do you go through more of them if you print with any regularity, but they’re also wasteful.
  • Canon Pixma Pro-200: 12.6ml cartridges, $1.11 per ml

When you break down the ink costs into comparable numbers (cost per ml), they are quite startling. It’s not completely comparable; you’ll spend more on ink with a 10-ink printer than a six- or eight-color one, but it gives you a good idea about roughly how much you’ll spend to print.

Epson’s materials boast that ET-8500’s Claria inks give you “enough ink to print 6,200 color pages,” but that is for basic ISO ratings in the default printing mode, not for photos.9For more on Epson’s specifics, see epson.com/ink-yield-cartridge-info. It is a decent indicator of how little ink you’ll use for document printing, however.

Printing photos will use more ink, and Epson claims that it is the per-print cost that is more important with the EcoTank Photo printers. Their literature states that you can print “4×6 photos for about 4 cents vs. 40 cents with traditional ink cartridges,” which feels like a more helpful calculation when thinking about the ET-8500/ET-8550 as photo printers. When you look at these models’ lower costs per ml of replacement ink, it is clear that you’ll be spending far less than you would with a dedicated photo printer, at least one in the sub-$1,000 range.10The $1,300 Epson SureColor P900 can print 4×6 photos at roughly 17 cents per page, according to Red River’s Cost of Inkjet Printing resource. While it’s not 4 cents, it’s quite reasonable, given the print quality and flexibility of that printer, which has 50ml ink cartridges.

With cartridge-based photo printers, most users will be lucky to get 100 to 200 prints before they start having to replace inks.11This, of course depends upon the capacities of the ink cartridges used. During the review process, I produced more than 600 prints on the ET-8500—of various sizes from 4×6 to 8.5×11—and had yet to run out of any ink at all. I wasn’t even close, to be honest. At 500 prints, I checked the ink levels, and this is where my printer’s ink levels were (roughly):

  • Black (pigment) 90%
  • Photo Black 75%
  • Cyan 55%
  • Yellow 65%
  • Magenta 55%
  • Gray 25%

As noted in the print quality section, Epson is clearly using gray to carry a lot of the heavy lifting in the print engine, but the fact that I was barely to the halfway level for the other inks was startling. To think that I could get to between 650 and 700 prints before having to replace a single ink color12I added additional Gray ink from a new bottle at 750 prints., and over 1,000 prints before I would have to replace any of the CMY inks is a game changer.

Of course, your mileage will vary, depending upon how many photos you print, and their size. ET-8550 users who will print more at 11″x14″ or 13″x19″ will obviously need to replace inks earlier than users of the ET-8500. Even with those approximate calculations, however, the lower ink costs will save considerable money (and waste) in the long run.

Other items of note

While most of our focus in this review is on the photo-specific aspects of the ET-8500, here are a few other things worthy of mention.

Print speed is far down my list of reasons for choosing one photo printer over another, but in the interest of completeness, I’ll note that the ET-8500 is quite speedy, both when printing photos and documents.

Photo printing offers three print modes, Draft, Quality and High Quality.13The original driver versions of the ET-8500 had four levels, similar to the plain paper print modes described below. A driver update in late 2021 apparently changed it to the current set of Draft, Quality and Hight Quality. Not sure what that’s about.

Draft mode is oddly named; the label makes me think of old dot-matrix output, but it’s blazingly fast, spitting out a 5×7 bordered print in 16 seconds—and the prints look quite good. Quality is slightly slower, and High Quality the slowest. Most of the time, I printed photos at the default Quality setting, and was more than happy with them; it was quite hard to tell the difference between the top two tiers at all. My advice would be to play around with all three modes, and see if you can tell any appreciable difference in your prints. Average print speeds for various print sizes are listed in the table below:

4×65×78×10
Draft0:140:160:31
Quality0:210:260:50
High Quality1:251:443:22

For plain paper printing, the ET-8500 has four printing modes, Economy, Normal, Fine, and Best Quality, which essentially moves from super fast to super slow as the quality increases. The text in Economy prints is jagged, but readable, and graphics are ok, especially if you’re looking at printed webpages (like those from Google Maps). Normal is quite speedy, and the text and graphics are smoother, and with finer detail than Economy; for most of the time, this setting provides the best balance of quality and speed. To my eye, there wasn’t a lot of difference between Fine and Best Quality, especially with regard to black-and-white documents—Best Quality often took four times longer than Fine to print. Graphics-heavy color documents (think presentations) did look slightly better in Best Quality mode, especially on high-quality inkjet paper, but it’s hard for me to justify the print time of the Best mode.

6-page text document (B&W)6-page text and graphics document (color)
Economy0:200:25
Normal0:230:42
Fine2:563:26
Best Quality13:1415:54

Duplex printing

The ET-8500 has a built-in duplexing capability when you’re printing on plain paper. The option only works when the printer is connected via a USB connection, and you have to jump through a few hoops in the driver to turn it on, although you can save the settings as a preset. (Oddly, you can print duplex from a phone or tablet when connecting to the printer via WiFi.)

Scanner/Copier

The flatbed document scanner/copier is quite useful, albeit without a feed mechanism for copying or scanning a stack of pages. (We wouldn’t expect that, given the target audience for the printer.) The maximum page size for scanning/copying is letter size for the ET-8500, and legal (8.5 x 14 inches) for the ET-8550. The copy resolution is 600 x 600 dpi, while the maximum scanning resolution is 1200 x 4800 dpi.

Phone/Tablet support

If you’re using a phone or a tablet, Epson gives you nearly all of the functionality of the desktop with the Epson Smart Panel app for iOS and Android. This well-designed app lets you print photos from your camera roll, as well as edit photos for print and apply creative effects to your prints. You can also scan, copy, and print documents, access the printer help system, and much more.

Conclusions

In 30-plus years of reviewing photo printers, I have seen many breakthroughs, but there has been one constant throughout: the high costs of the inks used by these printers. It’s one of the primary reasons that many people shy away from buying a photo printer—or inkjets in general. When you start to look at the cost of an ink cartridge, and multiply that by the number of inks a printer has, the costs look enormous. The promise of the supertank printers has largely been relegated to standard document printing, but with the EcoTank Photo ET-8500 and ET-8550, the ink-cost equation has been changed for the better.

Will the ET-8500 and ET-8550 provide you with the best photo quality for any printer in its range? No, discerning viewers who study prints will notice the wider gamut of printers like the SureColor P700/P900 and Canon’s Pro-200/300. If you look closely, you’ll see that those printers—with their larger inksets—print with finer tonal gradations, especially in complex images. And, when compared to pigment-based printers, you won’t get 100+ years of print longevity14On some paper types, and with museum-style preservation techniques. with the ET-8500.

All that said, the ET-8500 will give you excellent prints, that, when preserved with simple storage techniques, can last decades. And those prints will cost significantly less than those of the dedicated photo printers I’ve been reviewing for the past 30 years. Whether you’re printing snapshots of family life, travel photos, or artwork that you’d like to put on your wall (or a friend’s wall), the prints from the ET-8500 and ET-8550 are rich, vibrant and full of life.

In the end, it is important to understand that these are not printers designed for fine art photographers or pros; they’re for amateurs and enthusiasts who want to print, but have been scared off by the complexity, singular function, and high costs of traditional, cartridge-based photo printers. For that, the EcoTank Photo printers are ideal. And it makes me hopeful for a future day when we’ll have true “supertank” photo printers with wide-gamut, 8- to 12-color inksets that have much lower ink costs (and waste) than the ones we have today.

  • 1
    To be fair, most dedicated photo printers generally have six to 12 ink colors, which provides a wider gamut than is possible with the standard cyan, magenta, yellow, black (CMYK) inksets.
  • 2
    Canon has also announced a six-color supertank all-in-one printer, the $300 Pixma G620. I have ordered one for review, but supplies have been constrained for months. As soon as I get it in, I’ll post my findings. (UPDATE, June 2022: Don’t waste your time — this is not a printer for a serious amateur.)
  • 3
    I’m not joking; check it out.
  • 4
    Like the Stylus Photo 2880 and the Stylus Pro 3800, both of which were reviewed here, long ago in a printerverse far, far away. [You can find them all in our reviews gulag.]
  • 5
    This also means that the Gray ink is apparently used much more than the other inks. More on that below.
  • 6
    Currently, only Red River had posted color profiles for the ET-8500/ET-8550.
  • 7
    In general, when producing black-and-white prints, dye inks tend to display much more variability under different lighting conditions than pigments. It’s one reason why most fine-art black-and-white work is printed on pigment printers.
  • 8
    One of my long-standing complaints about the Canon desktop inkjets has been their low-capacity ink cartridges. Not only do you go through more of them if you print with any regularity, but they’re also wasteful.
  • 9
    For more on Epson’s specifics, see epson.com/ink-yield-cartridge-info.
  • 10
    The $1,300 Epson SureColor P900 can print 4×6 photos at roughly 17 cents per page, according to Red River’s Cost of Inkjet Printing resource. While it’s not 4 cents, it’s quite reasonable, given the print quality and flexibility of that printer, which has 50ml ink cartridges.
  • 11
    This, of course depends upon the capacities of the ink cartridges used.
  • 12
    I added additional Gray ink from a new bottle at 750 prints.
  • 13
    The original driver versions of the ET-8500 had four levels, similar to the plain paper print modes described below. A driver update in late 2021 apparently changed it to the current set of Draft, Quality and Hight Quality. Not sure what that’s about.
  • 14
    On some paper types, and with museum-style preservation techniques.

Scorecard: Epson EcoTank Photo ET-8500 and ET-8550

EcoTank ET-8500, $600 [Epson’s product page | Amazon]
EcoTank ET-8550, $700 [Epson’s product page | Amazon]

These two “supertank” printers offer excellent, speedy photo output at a fraction of the cost per print found in dedicated, cartridge-based photo printers. While they’re not designed to be fine-art printers, they will be darn close for most casual and serious amateur photographers who want to get into printing. The smaller ET-8500 is delightfully compact and prints anything up to letter size, while the slightly larger ET-8550 can print up to 13″ x 19″, making it perfect for photographers who want to print a bit bigger without breaking the bank.

Pros: Excellent print quality, especially on glossy and semigloss paper types; high-capacity ink tanks with ink costs that dwarf those of dedicated photo printers; flexible paper handling options, including a straight print path for papers up to 1.2mil thick; strong support for printing from phones and tablets (in addition to Mac and Windows computers); scan and copy support, as well as economical printing of standard documents.

Cons: None significant for its target audience; some small interface issues; setting up straight paper path is confusing at first.


Disclosure: We only review and recommend products that we use ourselves. The Amazon links above are affiliate links, and we may earn a small commission when you buy something, at no cost to you.  

30 thoughts on “Review: Epson EcoTank Photo ET-8500/ET-8550”

  1. Just picked up the ET-8550 based on your review, and it does not disappoint. Only printer I’ve owned where the first print came out looking just like the display.

    This is replacing an aging R1900 that’s become difficult to get ink for. Did the math, 8 bottles of 70ml of ink for the R1900 (if such a thing existed) would cost over $600.

    Reply
  2. Rick, thanks for your hard work and sharing your experience and knowledge with everyone. Your website truly is a wealth of information!

    At the current prices of $799 for the ET-8550, do you think it makes sense to just add $100 and get the Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-300 at $899 instead?

    Overall both printers seem to deliver excellent printing quality while also being more economical than their competitors with the Canon having the edge in print quality by using pigment-based ink and the Epson being cheaper and more convenient to maintain.

    Best,
    Vincent

    Reply
    • The PRO-300 is a great printer, and I wouldn’t discount it in the least. If you’re just starting out, and haven’t really printed before, the Epson EcoTank printer is an excellent starter printer. You’ll get great prints on a variety of media types, and the ink costs are hard to beat. I can’t rave enough about it, to be honest.

      If you’ve been printing previously on an older photo printer, and are primarily interested in printing on more fine art and baryta papers, the PRO-300 is definitely a better pick. The ink costs are more than three times that of the EcoTank, but are in line with traditional photo printers.

      Reply
  3. Reading your review and about to buy, but stopped in my tracks by your comment about duplex printing. Only possible while while connected via USB? Not seen this astonishing limitation mentioned anywhere else. Is it really true?

    Reply
    • I use duplex printing occasionally with my Epson 8550. My only connection to the printer is via WiFi, and duplex works fine with this interface.

      Reply
      • That’s great to know, Preston — thanks. Epson clearly has fixed it, because it was an issue with the original drivers. I’ll amend the review.

        Reply
  4. Thanks for putting together a great review.

    FYI – I have the 8550 set up as a wired network printer. I have been using the auto duplex function from both my desktop (via setting in the print dialog) and mobile (via Android) since day one with no issues.

    Reply
  5. Rick,
    I have been looking for a quality Photo Printer, ever since I became an avid amateur photographer in 2012.

    Print Qualiy is a major priority, with Print Cost coming a close second.

    I have been using Canon PIXMA Printers in the past, but I’ve not been happy with the reliability of the Canon’s. Therefore, I am looking to find something more reliable.

    I recently purchased an Eco-Tank Printer for work, and really appreciate the the Print Quality & Cost to use.

    I have done my research for my Printer needs, and have decided to purchase the ET-8550.

    Your review is the best I’ve read; very informative and enlightening! Thanks for your in-depth review. I will definitely be using PRINTERVILLE in the future.

    Reply
  6. Hi
    Thank you for a very informative review. I am sure this is the printer for me. My most important criteria was the paper handling and could I load more than 2 or 3 sheets of heavy glossy paper at one time. I need the positioning of the paper to say accurate. I find with the cheaper printers you can get a 1mm or 2mm move when its gets to the end. Hoping this printer will hold the sheets perfectly.

    Reply
  7. I bought my Epson 8550 to print photos and also generic documents. I am noticing that very little ink is used from the 2 blacks. Is there a setting I should be using when I am doing doc and not pictures? I do notice that the gray ink is consumed much fast than any other tank. thanks.

    Reply
    • The gray ink is the one that gets used the most — it helps with tonality when printing photos (and graphics, to a lesser degree). The Photo Black ink is used for photos on glossy/semigloss papers only, and the other black is for regular documents and photos printed on matte papers.

      After a year of use, I had yet to replace either black ink, and still had half a bottle of gray ink left from the one bottle I had had to purchase.

      Reply
  8. Hi Rick hopefully you see these messages still…

    I have been recommended the 8550 as i want to print on the mat border card you get in photo frames.

    The size of this mat card is 220mm wide (8.66in)

    Do you know if This would fit into the 8500? I know it says max width 8.5in but i know some printers allow a little bit extra?

    Thanks mate

    Reply
    • No, Matt — 8.5 inches is as wide as it will allow printing.

      Sorry, man…tough to have to go to the 8550 for .16 of an inch.

      Rick

      Reply
  9. Very nice review. I am personally considering this printer for home use and some print sales. I think the P Series is probably more ideal for “Fine Art” print sales and I would like to get one eventually. However, it’s been a long while since I have had a home photo printer and the the ET-8550 looks ideal to back into the swing of things.

    I believe that the discernible qualitative difference between this and the P Series is there, but from normal viewing distances the ET-8550 output would probably hold-up fine for my intended (non- art gallery) audience. I would price accordingly and not represent the prints as archival or ‘fine art’ to a customer, but in reality the fade resistance is probably comparable to photographic process color prints (longer than my or potential customers remaining years on this planet).

    Looks like a perfect starter printer to learn the craft of printing on.

    Reply
    • Thanks, Kevin — I think you’re correct about the 8500/8550 on all counts. In our print workshops, we have one on the network, and have found that folks new to printing just love the simplicity (and lower costs) of the Ecotank series. I think we’ve sold about 7 or 8 of them based on the workshops alone.

      best,
      Rick

      Reply
  10. Thanks for the review. In the past I had an HP pigment printer that did great prints but the ink costs were shockingly high. Each cartridge cost $39 per color and there was a ton of different colors, I think 12. I would have to replace these almost every time I printed. It would cost me hundreds of dollars to print a few photos. It was an endless cycle where I didn’t want to print anything. The last straw was when I went to print again and the printheads needed to be replaced. I threw the printer away. It was the most expensive printer to operate, literally hundreds of dollars per month. I am jaded now.

    I was looking at the Canon Pro 200 and 300 vs. the ET-8550. I am an amateur photographer but I would like the prints to look like what’s been calibrated on my screen. Will the ET-8500 do the job? I will not be printing a lot but would like excellent photo quality printing and longevity for pictures printed and display in frames.

    Will the Canon or Epson printers clog up and need new cartridges or printheads due to not being used constantly? I guess that’s one of my primary concerns how do the three printers handle sporadic use. And which printer prints natural skin tones. Thanks!

    Reply
  11. any tricks on getting the automatic duplex to work? I have tried every combo I can think of. USB – WIFI – plain white paper etc. it randomly works sometimes but then not always

    Reply
  12. I had a n Epsom expression 810 photo printer which I was more than happy with for a number of years. Finally a paper jam which I hadn’t thoroughly cleared wrecked it.

    I do a lot of scanning – is the scanner of the same type which from memory had a home and an office function. I especially need the marquee tool to scan only a section of the original image?

    I don’t want to print documents back to back – I hope this is possible

    Thank you for your informative research on ET photo 8550

    Reply
    • The software for scanning with the 8500 has a marquee tool, but I’m not sure what you mean when you say you “don’t want printing documents back to back” — there is a duplex option, but it’s a bit kludgey, and it works intermittently.

      Reply
  13. Hi Rick
    I have been recommended the pixma pro 200 and the Epson
    EcoTank ET-15000
    Having read your reviews I would love to ask your opinion which I trust
    Thanks in advance
    Kindest
    Vicki

    Reply
    • Hi Vicki,

      The Pixma is a very good printer, but is really designed to be a photo printer. The EcoTank ET-15000 is designed to be a more general-purpose printer than the ET-8500/8550, which are designed to print photos and basic documents.

      Everyone I know who has bought one of the EcoTank Photo printers has loved it, not only for printing photos, but as an all-around general-purpose printer. I’d go for that over the Pixma for almost everyone.

      Rick

      Reply
    • I’m not sure, quite honestly. At least with respect to exact representation. Dye inks in general tend to have a slight color cast on a lot of media, and while I think the ET-8500 does well in black and white, it’s not going to give the same level of neutrality that a pigment-based printer will.

      (sorry for the delay in responding — I moved the site, and a bunch of comments for stuck and I didn’t see them until now)

      Reply
  14. I have a problem with indentations on glossy papers I tried. I don’t use Epson , too expensive so I can’t tell, I think a printer can use other papers than only the ones from the brand.
    I tried many things, but I still have the problem, according to the review, I have to try that : the straight path feed ?
    And you also say at a moment that driver can’t change the thick paper size in advanced options, or even if the option is on the driver , it doesn’t change anything in the printer ? and I have to put it on the printer ?

    Thanks for the help and the tips. (I had an exchange for a new one and I still have this problem).

    Thanks for reading too 🙂

    Reply
  15. Is there a scannerless, but otherwise equivalent version? I’ve already got a really good scanner, and I’m hoping I can save some money by getting a scannerless model.

    Reply
    • There’s a model sold in Europe that appears to use the ET-8500 print engine, without the scanner, but I’ve heard nothing about it being made available in the States, or elsewhere.

      Reply
  16. Hello Rick LePage, man……I have been scouring the internet for the past two weeks looking at good photo printer reviews and all. I’ve read/watched videos on YouTube about Canon Pixma 200, 300 and the Epson Ecotank 8500/8550. Your article here was absolutely the most informative. It kept me captivated as I read because you was answering many questions that I had about those particular printers. I mainly was looking at the Canon Pixma 200 and Ecotank 8550 . The Epson P700 and P900 just cost to much cartridge wise.

    I want to thank you whole heartedly.

    Reply
    • Thanks for the kind words, Keith. They’re much appreciated.

      I can’t tell you how many people are happy with their ET-8500/8550. In our print workshops last spring, we had 6 (out of 12 people) who came wanting to improve their printing, and were using the EcoTanks. It really is an amazing little printer for the price.

      Reply

Leave a Reply